Recall of some kits of Real APS' BPC10

QueenMuntha

QueenMuntha

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2026
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
Imported archive
Just saw this in Discord.





ebbf1eb9130368568e3d1cc12ac28e205147fe88412a246a7d925d24d6a9ecbd.webp


Dear Consumers:

In recent testing, we discovered that BPC10 (production batch - serial number: PYQI-A) has insufficient content/purity.

We highly value your safety and user experience.To eliminate potential risks , and protect consumer rights, customers who purchased BPC10 with batch - serial number "PYQI-A" pls contact us. We will handle the matter according to the following solutions:

① Free replacement with a brand new batch of BPC10

② Replacement with another product

③ Refund

Customers who ordered BPC10, please check the product label you received.

If it matches the label shown in the image (batch - serial number: PYQI-A), please contact us through the original ordering channel, providing your order information or transaction hash/TxID, to process a return, exchange, or refund.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause , and thank you for your understanding .

We will continue to strictly control product quality to ensure the safety of every user.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
They were all half filled so they are thinking they are wolverine mislabeled as straight BPC, which is what happened with another vendor in the last week also.
 
jpru2001 said:


They were all half filled so they are thinking they are wolverine mislabeled as straight BPC, which is what happened with another vendor in the last week also.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Wasnt it spb steppin on their dick again?
 
Airborne Daddy said:


Wasnt it spb steppin on their dick again?

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
yeah. you may have seen the endo test they had come back recently also with by far the highest number I have ever seen.
 
Yikes I’ve been using this batch for the last couple weeks. Dosing at what I thought was 500mcg twice a day, I haven’t noticed any results. Does anyone know if it actually has TB500 in it or only 5g of BPC
 
slowbro said:


Yikes I’ve been using this batch for the last couple weeks. Dosing at what I thought was 500mcg twice a day, I haven’t noticed any results. Does anyone know if it actually has TB500 in it or only 5g of BPC

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
The original test came back with the other peptide as unknown. So they’re retesting to find out what it is.
 
slowbro said:


Yikes I’ve been using this batch for the last couple weeks. Dosing at what I thought was 500mcg twice a day, I haven’t noticed any results. Does anyone know if it actually has TB500 in it or only 5g of BPC

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
They’ll send you a new kit
 
ColdSmoke said:


They’ll send you a new kit

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I saw that, they already created the shipping label for it 🙏🏻

CheetosYum said:


The original test came back with the other peptide as unknown. So they’re retesting to find out what it is.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
thanks I’ll keep my eye out for any other info. I’m debating whether I want to keep it or not and if I knew what was in it then at least I could understand the dose better.
 
APS added R30 (lavender cap) to the announcement. Do not use until further testing

Not a good look for APS right now.
 
Alc23 said:


APS added R30 (lavender cap) to the announcement. Do not use until further testing

Not a good look for APS right now.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Their entire serial number story has fallen apart. All the testing organised around batch numbers has crumbled because they only withdrew the BPC-10 PYQI-A, those with PYQI found it is not recalled. But for a long time they have maintained the suffixes (the -A bit) are warehouse codes, they are not they are just part of the serial number. It might mean something to their supplier but its unclear what and clearly from our perspective they are different products requiring testing.

Every COA ever created for APS has been based on the suffix (-A -1) as unimportant. They have only put a hold on R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap). But you should not assume that this means over REPTN is safe, it is simply untested.

APS testing is in pure chaos now. Any COA that doesn't define its suffix (confused somewhat by the fact they often don't have one for the first batch) means no one knows what was tested.
 
BrightCandle said:


Their entire serial number story has fallen apart. All the testing organised around batch numbers has crumbled because they only withdrew the BPC-10 PYQI-A, those with PYQI found it is not recalled. But for a long time they have maintained the suffixes (the -A bit) are warehouse codes, they are not they are just part of the serial number. It might mean something to their supplier but its unclear what and clearly from our perspective they are different products requiring testing.

Every COA ever created for APS has been based on the suffix (-A -1) as unimportant. They have only put a hold on R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap). But you should not assume that this means over REPTN is safe, it is simply untested.

APS testing is in pure chaos now. Any COA that doesn't define its suffix (confused somewhat by the fact they often don't have one for the first batch) means no one knows what was tested.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Just when I was about to order, can I ask where you find out the valuable information , knowledge is key
 
Hello beutiful said:


Just when I was about to order, can I ask where you find out the valuable information , knowledge is key

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I am part of the 2 test groups with APS products that found these problems. The BPC-10 and the R30, both these failures are my failures, I am out a lot of $ right now. STG and APS Testing Community are where most of this is happening.
 
I got a batch of KPV from them which they said was waiting for testing results to be back from Jano and after chasing a few times they admitted they never did the testing and have since changed the batch so were not going to bother.

Very few people around for testing so was cheaper to buy again from GB than test myself.
 
slowbro said:


Yikes I’ve been using this batch for the last couple weeks. Dosing at what I thought was 500mcg twice a day, I haven’t noticed any results. Does anyone know if it actually has TB500 in it or only 5g of BPC

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
ive been following it closely bc I was gonna buy, and I think that batch (or some variations of that batch (the codes afterwards) were swapped out with Wolverine in error, so, I think either way, you are either pinning BPC-157 alone OR Wolverine Blend. I dont think it is just a total bunk product, but that is just my summary on reading many posts.
 
BrightCandle said:


Their entire serial number story has fallen apart. All the testing organised around batch numbers has crumbled because they only withdrew the BPC-10 PYQI-A, those with PYQI found it is not recalled. But for a long time they have maintained the suffixes (the -A bit) are warehouse codes, they are not they are just part of the serial number. It might mean something to their supplier but its unclear what and clearly from our perspective they are different products requiring testing.

Every COA ever created for APS has been based on the suffix (-A -1) as unimportant. They have only put a hold on R30 REPTN-1 (lilac cap). But you should not assume that this means over REPTN is safe, it is simply untested.

APS testing is in pure chaos now. Any COA that doesn't define its suffix (confused somewhat by the fact they often don't have one for the first batch) means no one knows what was tested.

Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Yes, trying to get clarity of what is up with the coding. I am not going to jump to bad conclusions immediately, but for the sake of COAs, it is important to know what the extra numbers on the batch codes means. I got T30-A Batch PNPU-N2 If N2 is a different processor, Id like to know. PNPU N1 tested great
 
Back
Top